Clay vs Gapsy Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Clay (4.2/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record.. Clay is the stronger option for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Clay vs Gapsy Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Clay | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Dnipro, Ukraine |
| Team size | Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best for | B2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility. | Fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, Webflow | Figma, Webflow, After Effects |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail |
Clay vs Gapsy Studio: overview
Clay
Clay (clay.global) is a product design studio based in San Francisco with extensive NYC-based client work; the company does not publish a founding year in available sources, so it is tagged here as unconfirmed. Team size is likewise not independently confirmed, best treated as boutique-to-mid-size. Clay's client list includes Coinbase, Uber, SendGrid, MoneyLion, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon, Toyota, and Samsung, with deep B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech experience. Note: this is the design studio at clay.global, distinct from the unrelated AI sales-data company Clay (clay.com).
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio states it has operated 'since 2014' (also citing '9+ years of experience'; the founding year is treated as self-reported), and is headquartered in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than publishing a specific headcount, the studio describes itself as a 'collective of creative professionals' with 500+ completed projects. Gapsy holds a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews and 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush, covering UI/UX, branding, motion, and web/app development for fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail clients.
Services and capabilities: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
| Capability | Clay | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
| Framework / platform | Clay | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
| Criterion | Clay | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
| Dimension | Clay | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup, Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Clay vs Gapsy Studio: pros and cons
| Clay | |
|---|---|
| + | Client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon) is exceptional for a studio of unconfirmed, boutique-to-mid size |
| + | Deep, specific experience across B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech product design |
| + | San Francisco base with a strong track record of NYC-based client work |
| + | UX design plus branding and web/product design under one roof |
| - | Founding year is not independently confirmed by any source outside the company itself — treat as unconfirmed |
| - | Team size is not published or independently verifiable, making capacity planning harder for large programs |
| - | Easily confused with the unrelated AI company Clay (clay.com) when researching online — verify you are looking at clay.global |
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster |
| + | 13+ international design awards spanning Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Serves five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail), offering broad vertical coverage |
| - | Does not publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to assess delivery capacity than studios with published team sizes |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Broad five-industry positioning means somewhat less deep specialization than single-vertical boutiques like UXDA |
Who should choose Clay?
Clay is the right choice for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility..
Deep B2B/SaaS/AI/fintech design experience with a client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack) unusually strong for an unconfirmed-size boutique. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products.
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the right choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record..
5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international design awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Decision matrix: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Clay |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Clay (Not published) vs Gapsy Studio ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
| Use case | Clay fit | Gapsy Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Clay vs Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international design awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. It is best for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record..
Clay (4.2/5) is the better choice when b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility.. If your situation matches those criteria, Clay is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Clay vs Gapsy Studio FAQ
Is Clay better than Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Clay is better for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility.. Gapsy Studio is better for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record..
How do Clay and Gapsy Studio differ in pricing?
Clay uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Clay or Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Clay and Gapsy Studio?
Clay's primary differentiator is: deep b2b/saas/ai/fintech design experience with a client list (coinbase, uber, meta, google, slack) unusually strong for an unconfirmed-size boutique. Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: 5.0/5.0 clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international design awards from behance, awwwards, and fwa. They also differ in team size (Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) vs Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.