Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Fireart Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) overall. Fireart Studio is the better choice for startups and mid-market companies that want a single studio to handle both product design and full software development.. Gapsy Studio is the stronger option for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Fireart Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| HQ | Warsaw, Poland (Ukraine-founded roots) | Dnipro, Ukraine |
| Team size | 100–150+ | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best for | Startups and mid-market companies that want a single studio to handle both product design and full software development. | Fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team, T&M | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Webflow, After Effects |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail |
Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio: overview
Fireart Studio
Founded in 2013 with roots in Ukraine, Fireart Studio is now headquartered in Warsaw, Poland, having grown from 1 to 150+ people over ten years. The studio has delivered 700+ projects for 200+ clients and holds Clutch recognition as a 'Leading UX Design Team' along with Top Graphic Design Company recognitions from Clutch, DesignRush, and The Manifest. Fireart positions itself as a boutique digital product design and software development studio.
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio states it has operated 'since 2014' (also citing '9+ years of experience'; the founding year is treated as self-reported), and is headquartered in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than publishing a specific headcount, the studio describes itself as a 'collective of creative professionals' with 500+ completed projects. Gapsy holds a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews and 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush, covering UI/UX, branding, motion, and web/app development for fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail clients.
Services and capabilities: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Capability | Fireart Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Framework / platform | Fireart Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Criterion | Fireart Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time & materials | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Dimension | Fireart Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | End-to-end SaaS product design and development, Startup MVP design and build | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio: pros and cons
| Fireart Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years is one of the deepest track records among boutique studios in this list |
| + | Clutch-recognized 'Leading UX Design Team,' with additional Top Graphic Design Company recognitions from DesignRush and The Manifest |
| + | Grew from 1 to 150+ people while retaining a boutique, single-studio culture |
| + | Combines product design with full software development, reducing hand-off risk |
| - | Relocated its HQ from Ukraine to Warsaw amid regional instability — worth noting for clients evaluating delivery continuity |
| - | $20K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier relative to the most accessible boutiques in this list |
| - | Broad software-development focus means slightly less pure design specialization than research-only studios |
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster |
| + | 13+ international design awards spanning Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Serves five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail), offering broad vertical coverage |
| - | Does not publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to assess delivery capacity than studios with published team sizes |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Broad five-industry positioning means somewhat less deep specialization than single-vertical boutiques like UXDA |
Who should choose Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio is the right choice for startups and mid-market companies that want a single studio to handle both product design and full software development..
700+ delivered projects across 200+ clients with independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition on Clutch. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the right choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record..
5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international design awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Decision matrix: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Fireart Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Fireart Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Gapsy Studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Use case | Fireart Studio fit | Gapsy Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| End-to-end SaaS product design and development | Strong | Limited | Fireart Studio |
| Startup MVP design and build | Strong | Limited | Fireart Studio |
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
Fireart Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. 700+ delivered projects across 200+ clients with independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition on Clutch. It is best for startups and mid-market companies that want a single studio to handle both product design and full software development..
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the better choice when fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record.. If your situation matches those criteria, Gapsy Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio FAQ
Is Fireart Studio better than Gapsy Studio?
Fireart Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Fireart Studio is better for startups and mid-market companies that want a single studio to handle both product design and full software development.. Gapsy Studio is better for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project track record..
How do Fireart Studio and Gapsy Studio differ in pricing?
Fireart Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Fireart Studio or Gapsy Studio?
Fireart Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Fireart Studio and Gapsy Studio?
Fireart Studio's primary differentiator is: 700+ delivered projects across 200+ clients with independently-verified 'leading ux design team' recognition on clutch. Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: 5.0/5.0 clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international design awards from behance, awwwards, and fwa. They also differ in team size (100–150+ vs Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects)), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products vs Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.