Clay vs Halo Lab: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Halo Lab (4.5/5) edges ahead of Clay (4.0/5) overall. Halo Lab is the better choice for E-commerce/web-app teams, #1 Dribbble studio, award-heavy. Clay is the stronger option for B2B SaaS, AI, fintech — big-tech credibility, low profile. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Clay vs Halo Lab: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Clay | Halo Lab |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Multiple offices across 3 time zones (Ukraine-rooted) |
| Team size | Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) | 130+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | An unusually large enterprise client roster (Coinbase, Meta, Google, Slack) for a studio that doesn't publish its own founding year or team size | Currently ranked the #1 Dribbble Team globally, backed by 70+ design awards and a 4.9 Clutch rating |
| Pricing model | Fixed project | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, Webflow | Figma, Webflow, React |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | SaaS / B2B software, E-commerce / retail, Consumer products |
Clay vs Halo Lab: overview
Clay
Clay — clay.global, not to be confused with the unrelated AI sales-data company at clay.com — keeps an unusually low public profile for a studio whose client list includes Coinbase, Uber, SendGrid, MoneyLion, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon, Toyota, and Samsung. Neither its founding year nor its team size is published or independently confirmed, which is itself worth flagging to prospective clients doing due diligence. What is clear from its portfolio is deep, repeated experience across B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech product design, based out of San Francisco with significant NYC-based client work.
Halo Lab
Halo Lab doesn't publish an exact founding date — the studio states "12 years" of experience as of 2026, which implies a start around 2014. What is documented is the scale: 130+ people working from multiple offices across three time zones, with roots in Ukraine. Halo Lab holds a 4.9 Clutch rating, has picked up 70+ design awards, and currently ranks as the #1 Dribbble Team globally — an unusually consistent, ongoing signal of visual design quality that's harder to game than a one-time award.
Services and capabilities: Clay vs Halo Lab
| Capability | Clay | Halo Lab |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Clay vs Halo Lab
| Framework / platform | Clay | Halo Lab |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Clay vs Halo Lab
| Criterion | Clay | Halo Lab |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Clay vs Halo Lab
| Dimension | Clay | Halo Lab |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | SaaS / B2B software, E-commerce / retail, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup, Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | E-commerce platform redesign, Marketing site plus product design bundle |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Clay vs Halo Lab: pros and cons
| Clay | |
|---|---|
| + | Client list — Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon — is exceptional for a studio that doesn't publish its own size |
| + | Deep, repeated experience across B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech product design |
| + | San Francisco base with substantial NYC-based client engagement history |
| + | Combines UX, branding, and web/product design under one team |
| - | Founding year isn't published or independently confirmed by any source outside the company |
| - | Team size isn't published either, making capacity planning harder for larger programs |
| - | Easily confused online with the unrelated AI company Clay (clay.com) — confirm you're looking at clay.global |
| Halo Lab | |
|---|---|
| + | Currently the #1-ranked Dribbble Team globally — an independently observable, ongoing quality signal |
| + | 70+ design awards and a 4.9 Clutch rating make it one of the most consistently recognized studios on this list |
| + | 130+ person team spans multiple offices and three time zones, supporting larger programs |
| + | Broad service range covers complex web apps, marketing sites, e-commerce, and mobile |
| - | Exact founding year isn't confirmed — the studio's own '12 years as of 2026' claim implies roughly 2014 but isn't independently verified |
| - | Ukraine-rooted origins carry the same regional-continuity considerations as other studios on this list |
| - | Broad service range across web, e-commerce, mobile, and marketing means less singular specialization than fintech- or research-focused boutiques |
Who should choose Clay?
A typical fit: AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup.
An unusually large enterprise client roster (Coinbase, Meta, Google, Slack) for a studio that doesn't publish its own founding year or team size. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products.
Who should choose Halo Lab?
A typical fit: e-commerce platform redesign.
Currently ranked the #1 Dribbble Team globally, backed by 70+ design awards and a 4.9 Clutch rating. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, E-commerce / retail, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Clay vs Halo Lab
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Clay |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Halo Lab |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Clay (Not published) vs Halo Lab ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Clay |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Clay vs Halo Lab
| Use case | Clay fit | Halo Lab fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| E-commerce platform redesign | Limited | Strong | Halo Lab |
| Marketing site plus product design bundle | Limited | Strong | Halo Lab |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Clay vs Halo Lab
Halo Lab (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Currently ranked the #1 Dribbble Team globally, backed by 70+ design awards and a 4.9 Clutch rating.
Clay (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand. If your situation matches that, Clay is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Clay vs Halo Lab FAQ
Is Clay better than Halo Lab?
Halo Lab (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Clay's strongest advantage: client list — Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon — is exceptional for a studio that doesn't publish its own size. Halo Lab's strongest advantage: currently the #1-ranked Dribbble Team globally — an independently observable, ongoing quality signal.
How do Clay and Halo Lab differ in pricing?
Clay uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Halo Lab uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Clay or Halo Lab?
Halo Lab is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Clay and Halo Lab?
Clay's primary differentiator is: an unusually large enterprise client roster (Coinbase, Meta, Google, Slack) for a studio that doesn't publish its own founding year or team size. Halo Lab's primary differentiator is: currently ranked the #1 Dribbble Team globally, backed by 70+ design awards and a 4.9 Clutch rating. They also differ in team size (Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) vs 130+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software, E-commerce / retail).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.