Clay vs Qubstudio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Qubstudio (4.6/5) edges ahead of Clay (4.2/5) overall. Qubstudio is the better choice for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise-scale product redesign.. Clay is the stronger option for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Clay vs Qubstudio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Clay | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2006 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | London, UK (Canary Wharf), Ukraine-based delivery team |
| Team size | Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) | 51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals) |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Best for | B2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility. | Fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise-scale product redesign. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, Webflow | Figma, Sketch, Webflow |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
Clay vs Qubstudio: overview
Clay
Clay (clay.global) is a product design studio based in San Francisco with extensive NYC-based client work; the company does not publish a founding year in available sources, so it is tagged here as unconfirmed. Team size is likewise not independently confirmed, best treated as boutique-to-mid-size. Clay's client list includes Coinbase, Uber, SendGrid, MoneyLion, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon, Toyota, and Samsung, with deep B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech experience. Note: this is the design studio at clay.global, distinct from the unrelated AI sales-data company Clay (clay.com).
Qubstudio
Qubstudio was founded around 2006 (some sources cite 2007) and is headquartered in London's Canary Wharf with a Ukraine-based delivery team. The company states roughly 70 creative professionals within a broader 51–200 employee band. Qubstudio ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch in its 2026 rankings with 90+ reviews, alongside Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition. The studio serves fintech, logistics, healthcare, and EdTech clients across MVP launches through enterprise digital transformation and mature-product redesigns.
Services and capabilities: Clay vs Qubstudio
| Capability | Clay | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Clay vs Qubstudio
| Framework / platform | Clay | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Clay vs Qubstudio
| Criterion | Clay | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Clay vs Qubstudio
| Dimension | Clay | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup, Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Fintech MVP launch design, Logistics platform UX overhaul |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Clay vs Qubstudio: pros and cons
| Clay | |
|---|---|
| + | Client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon) is exceptional for a studio of unconfirmed, boutique-to-mid size |
| + | Deep, specific experience across B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech product design |
| + | San Francisco base with a strong track record of NYC-based client work |
| + | UX design plus branding and web/product design under one roof |
| - | Founding year is not independently confirmed by any source outside the company itself — treat as unconfirmed |
| - | Team size is not published or independently verifiable, making capacity planning harder for large programs |
| - | Easily confused with the unrelated AI company Clay (clay.com) when researching online — verify you are looking at clay.global |
| Qubstudio | |
|---|---|
| + | Ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ public reviews |
| + | Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition independently verify design quality |
| + | Nearly two decades of operation with a London HQ and Ukraine-based delivery team |
| + | Covers the full range from MVP launches to enterprise digital transformation |
| - | Founding year is disputed between sources (2006 vs. 2007) — treated here as approximate |
| - | Ukraine-based delivery team introduces the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted studios in this list |
| - | 51–200 employee band published by directories is wide; the company's own stated ~70 creative professionals is more precise but self-reported |
Who should choose Clay?
Clay is the right choice for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility..
Deep B2B/SaaS/AI/fintech design experience with a client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack) unusually strong for an unconfirmed-size boutique. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products.
Who should choose Qubstudio?
Qubstudio is the right choice for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise-scale product redesign..
Ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch's 2026 rankings with 90+ reviews, backed by Red Dot Design Award recognition. Minimum engagement starts at $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Clay vs Qubstudio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Clay |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Qubstudio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Clay (Not published) vs Qubstudio ($15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Clay |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Clay vs Qubstudio
| Use case | Clay fit | Qubstudio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Fintech MVP launch design | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Logistics platform UX overhaul | Limited | Strong | Qubstudio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Clay vs Qubstudio
Qubstudio (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch's 2026 rankings with 90+ reviews, backed by Red Dot Design Award recognition. It is best for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise-scale product redesign..
Clay (4.2/5) is the better choice when b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility.. If your situation matches those criteria, Clay is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Clay vs Qubstudio FAQ
Is Clay better than Qubstudio?
Qubstudio (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Clay is better for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility.. Qubstudio is better for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise-scale product redesign..
How do Clay and Qubstudio differ in pricing?
Clay uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Qubstudio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Clay or Qubstudio?
Qubstudio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Clay and Qubstudio?
Clay's primary differentiator is: deep b2b/saas/ai/fintech design experience with a client list (coinbase, uber, meta, google, slack) unusually strong for an unconfirmed-size boutique. Qubstudio's primary differentiator is: ranked #1 ux/ui agency on clutch's 2026 rankings with 90+ reviews, backed by red dot design award recognition. They also differ in team size (Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) vs 51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.