Clay vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
UXDA (4.3/5) edges ahead of Clay (4.2/5) overall. UXDA is the better choice for banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX, with no distraction from other verticals.. Clay is the stronger option for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Clay vs UXDA: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Riga, Latvia |
| Team size | Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) | 25+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best for | B2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility. | Banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX, with no distraction from other verticals. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project | Fixed project, retainer |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, Webflow | Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech |
Clay vs UXDA: overview
Clay
Clay (clay.global) is a product design studio based in San Francisco with extensive NYC-based client work; the company does not publish a founding year in available sources, so it is tagged here as unconfirmed. Team size is likewise not independently confirmed, best treated as boutique-to-mid-size. Clay's client list includes Coinbase, Uber, SendGrid, MoneyLion, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon, Toyota, and Samsung, with deep B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech experience. Note: this is the design studio at clay.global, distinct from the unrelated AI sales-data company Clay (clay.com).
UXDA
UXDA (Financial UX Design) was founded in 2015 by Alex Kreger and co-founder Linda, and is headquartered in Riga, Latvia with a team of 25+ multidisciplinary specialists. Over the past decade, UXDA has defined or governed 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms across 39 countries. UXDA is exclusively focused on financial services, fintech, and banking UX — making it the clearest fintech specialist among the boutiques in this roster.
Services and capabilities: Clay vs UXDA
| Capability | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Clay vs UXDA
| Framework / platform | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | ✓ |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Clay vs UXDA
| Criterion | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Clay vs UXDA
| Dimension | Clay | UXDA |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup, Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Clay vs UXDA: pros and cons
| Clay | |
|---|---|
| + | Client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon) is exceptional for a studio of unconfirmed, boutique-to-mid size |
| + | Deep, specific experience across B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech product design |
| + | San Francisco base with a strong track record of NYC-based client work |
| + | UX design plus branding and web/product design under one roof |
| - | Founding year is not independently confirmed by any source outside the company itself — treat as unconfirmed |
| - | Team size is not published or independently verifiable, making capacity planning harder for large programs |
| - | Easily confused with the unrelated AI company Clay (clay.com) when researching online — verify you are looking at clay.global |
| UXDA | |
|---|---|
| + | Exclusive financial-services focus means deep domain expertise most generalist studios cannot match |
| + | 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade |
| + | Small, senior 25+ team keeps client relationships direct rather than layered through account management |
| + | A decade of continuous, single-vertical operation builds compounding domain knowledge |
| - | Exclusive fintech focus is a liability for any client outside financial services |
| - | $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is on the higher end for a 25-person boutique |
| - | Small team size (25+) limits capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs |
Who should choose Clay?
Clay is the right choice for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility..
Deep B2B/SaaS/AI/fintech design experience with a client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack) unusually strong for an unconfirmed-size boutique. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products.
Who should choose UXDA?
UXDA is the right choice for banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX, with no distraction from other verticals..
The only agency in this roster exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Clay vs UXDA
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Clay |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Clay (Not published) vs UXDA ($30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Clay |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Clay vs UXDA
| Use case | Clay fit | UXDA fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Bank digital platform redesign | Limited | Strong | UXDA |
| Fintech app UX for a regulated market | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Clay vs UXDA
UXDA (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. The only agency in this roster exclusively focused on financial services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. It is best for banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX, with no distraction from other verticals..
Clay (4.2/5) is the better choice when b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility.. If your situation matches those criteria, Clay is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Clay vs UXDA FAQ
Is Clay better than UXDA?
UXDA (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Clay is better for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies that want a boutique studio with big-tech client credibility.. UXDA is better for banks and fintech companies that want a studio exclusively focused on financial-services UX, with no distraction from other verticals..
How do Clay and UXDA differ in pricing?
Clay uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Clay or UXDA?
UXDA is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Clay and UXDA?
Clay's primary differentiator is: deep b2b/saas/ai/fintech design experience with a client list (coinbase, uber, meta, google, slack) unusually strong for an unconfirmed-size boutique. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only agency in this roster exclusively focused on financial services ux, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) vs 25+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.