Best Product Design Agencies

Huge Inc vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

UXDA (4.3/5) edges ahead of Huge Inc (3.7/5) overall. UXDA is the better choice for banks and fintech, exclusively financial-services UX. Huge Inc is the stronger option for large enterprise brands, big recently-restructured agency. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Huge Inc vs UXDA: head-to-head summary

Criterion Huge Inc UXDA
Founded 1999 2015
HQ Manhattan, NYC, USA (relocated from Brooklyn Oct 2025) Riga, Latvia
Team size ~1,240 25+
Rating 3.7 / 5 4.3 / 5
Primary differentiator One of the longest-running agency names on this list, now reset under new private-equity ownership and merged with Hero Digital The only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries
Pricing model Project-based, retainer Fixed project, retainer
Min. engagement Not published $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, React Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook
Industries served Enterprise transformation, Consumer products Financial services / fintech

Huge Inc vs UXDA: overview

Huge Inc

David Skokna, Sasha Kirovski, Gene Liebel, and Aaron Shapiro started Huge in Brooklyn in 1999; the agency moved to Manhattan in October 2025. Most of Huge's history was spent inside Interpublic Group, until private equity firm AEA Investors bought it in December 2024 and merged it with Hero Digital — recent enough that clients should ask how integration is going. Post-merger, the combined agency runs around 1,240 people, with engagement sizes typical of a large agency rather than published per project.

UXDA

Alex Kreger co-founded UXDA (Financial UX Design) in 2015, building a deliberately narrow practice from Riga, Latvia, with a 25-person multidisciplinary team. A decade in, UXDA has shaped or governed 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms across 39 countries — a level of single-vertical repetition none of the generalist studios on this list can claim. There's no branding or consumer-product work here; every engagement is financial-services UX.

Services and capabilities: Huge Inc vs UXDA

Capability Huge Inc UXDA
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: Huge Inc vs UXDA

Framework / platform Huge Inc UXDA
Figma
Webflow N/A
React N/A
Framer N/A N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A
After Effects N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Huge Inc vs UXDA

Criterion Huge Inc UXDA
Minimum engagement Not published $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Retainer Fixed project, Retainer
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Accessible

Target audience comparison: Huge Inc vs UXDA

Dimension Huge Inc UXDA
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Enterprise transformation, Consumer products Financial services / fintech
Best use cases Enterprise brand and digital product redesign, Large-scale web platform modernization Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Huge Inc vs UXDA: pros and cons

Huge Inc
+ 26 years of enterprise digital design case studies and brand history
+ Post-merger headcount of roughly 1,240 gives significant delivery capacity
+ Service range spans brand, product, and web design and development
+ The Hero Digital merger brings additional capabilities into the combined agency
- Sold to private equity firm AEA Investors in December 2024 and merged with Hero Digital — a structural change that's still settling
- Long tenure inside Interpublic Group followed by a 2024 sale means less continuity than an independently owned studio offers
- Large-agency engagement sizes aren't published, making budget planning harder for smaller teams
UXDA
+ Exclusive financial-services focus builds deep domain expertise generalist studios can't match
+ 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade
+ A small, senior 25-person team keeps relationships direct rather than layered through account management
+ A decade of single-vertical operation compounds domain knowledge project over project
- Exclusive fintech focus is a liability for any client outside financial services
- $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) runs high for a 25-person boutique
- Small team size caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs

Who should choose Huge Inc?

A typical fit: enterprise brand and digital product redesign.

One of the longest-running agency names on this list, now reset under new private-equity ownership and merged with Hero Digital. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products.

Who should choose UXDA?

A typical fit: bank digital platform redesign.

The only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.

Decision matrix: Huge Inc vs UXDA

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Huge Inc
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Huge Inc (Not published) vs UXDA ($30K (per company website; independently unverifiable))
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Huge Inc
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Huge Inc vs UXDA

Use case Huge Inc fit UXDA fit Winner
Enterprise brand and digital product redesign Strong Limited Huge Inc
Large-scale web platform modernization Strong Limited Huge Inc
Bank digital platform redesign Limited Strong UXDA
Fintech app UX for a regulated market Limited Strong UXDA
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Huge Inc vs UXDA

UXDA (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. The only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries.

Huge Inc (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need large-scale web platform modernization. If your situation matches that, Huge Inc is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Huge Inc vs UXDA FAQ

Is Huge Inc better than UXDA?

UXDA (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Huge Inc's strongest advantage: 26 years of enterprise digital design case studies and brand history. UXDA's strongest advantage: exclusive financial-services focus builds deep domain expertise generalist studios can't match.

How do Huge Inc and UXDA differ in pricing?

Huge Inc uses project-based, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Huge Inc or UXDA?

Huge Inc is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Huge Inc and UXDA?

Huge Inc's primary differentiator is: one of the longest-running agency names on this list, now reset under new private-equity ownership and merged with Hero Digital. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (~1,240 vs 25+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs Financial services / fintech).

Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.