Netguru vs UX studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
UX studio (4.4/5) edges ahead of Netguru (4.0/5) overall. UX studio is the better choice for complex B2B SaaS, research-first design partner. Netguru is the stronger option for companies wanting design plus full development, one team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Netguru vs UX studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Netguru | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 | 2013 |
| HQ | Poznań, Poland | Budapest, Hungary |
| Team size | 600–900+ | 60–71 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Combines product design with full software delivery at a scale (600–900+ people, 1,000+ projects) most boutiques on this list can't match | A research-first methodology comparable in rigor to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex B2B SaaS products |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team, T&M | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Node.js | Figma, Dovetail, Maze |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, E-commerce / retail | SaaS / B2B software |
Netguru vs UX studio: overview
Netguru
Wiktor Schmidt and Jakub Filipowski started Netguru in Poznań, Poland, in May 2008. Nearly two decades later it runs six Polish offices — Poznań, Warsaw, Kraków, Wrocław, Gdańsk, Białystok — and a team reported between 600 and 900+ people, delivering more than 1,000 projects. Netguru pairs product design with full software development for brands like IKEA, Volkswagen, OLX, Delivery Hero, Wolt, and Vinted, plus fintech client Solarisbank, and has picked up a Clutch Leader Award and a spot on the FT 1000 Europe's Fastest Growing Companies list.
UX studio
David Pasztor founded UX studio in Budapest, Hungary, in 2013, and the team has since grown to 60–71 people depending on source. Its practice centers on B2B SaaS companies with genuinely complex products — the kind where research has to come before any interface decisions get made. That research-first sequencing gives it one of the more direct methodology comparisons to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach among the studios in this list.
Services and capabilities: Netguru vs UX studio
| Capability | Netguru | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Netguru vs UX studio
| Framework / platform | Netguru | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Netguru vs UX studio
| Criterion | Netguru | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time & materials | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Netguru vs UX studio
| Dimension | Netguru | UX studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, E-commerce / retail | SaaS / B2B software |
| Best use cases | Large-scale SaaS or e-commerce product design and development, Fintech product build requiring both design and engineering at scale | Complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign, Discovery-phase UX research before a full product build |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Netguru vs UX studio: pros and cons
| Netguru | |
|---|---|
| + | 600–900+ person team across six Polish offices supports large, multi-workstream programs |
| + | 1,000+ delivered projects and a Clutch Leader Award back up the scale claim with independent recognition |
| + | Client list spans IKEA, Volkswagen, OLX, Delivery Hero, and fintech client Solarisbank |
| + | Pairs design with full development, reducing hand-off risk between design and engineering vendors |
| - | Reported team size varies by source (600 to 900+), making exact capacity harder to pin down |
| - | Scale suited to larger programs may mean less individualized attention than a boutique studio offers |
| - | Broad software-development focus means somewhat less concentrated design-only specialization than research-led boutiques |
| UX studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Research-first methodology is demonstrated through the studio's own published case studies, not just marketing language |
| + | Over a decade of continuous operation since 2013 under its founding team |
| + | Focused specifically on B2B SaaS, building real depth in untangling complex product workflows |
| + | 60–71 person team is large enough for multi-workstream engagements while staying boutique in culture |
| - | Exclusive B2B SaaS focus limits fit for consumer, healthcare, or fintech-specific projects |
| - | Research-first sequencing can extend project timelines for clients who want to move straight to UI |
| - | $20K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier, not the most accessible option |
Who should choose Netguru?
A typical fit: large-scale SaaS or e-commerce product design and development.
Combines product design with full software delivery at a scale (600–900+ people, 1,000+ projects) most boutiques on this list can't match. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, E-commerce / retail.
Who should choose UX studio?
A typical fit: complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign.
A research-first methodology comparable in rigor to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex B2B SaaS products. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software.
Decision matrix: Netguru vs UX studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Netguru |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Netguru |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Netguru (Not published) vs UX studio ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Netguru |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Netguru vs UX studio
| Use case | Netguru fit | UX studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large-scale SaaS or e-commerce product design and development | Strong | Limited | Netguru |
| Fintech product build requiring both design and engineering at scale | Strong | Limited | Netguru |
| Complex B2B SaaS product research and redesign | Limited | Strong | UX studio |
| Discovery-phase UX research before a full product build | Limited | Strong | UX studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Netguru vs UX studio
UX studio (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A research-first methodology comparable in rigor to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex B2B SaaS products.
Netguru (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need fintech product build requiring both design and engineering at scale. If your situation matches that, Netguru is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Netguru vs UX studio FAQ
Is Netguru better than UX studio?
UX studio (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Netguru's strongest advantage: 600–900+ person team across six Polish offices supports large, multi-workstream programs. UX studio's strongest advantage: research-first methodology is demonstrated through the studio's own published case studies, not just marketing language.
How do Netguru and UX studio differ in pricing?
Netguru uses fixed project, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. UX studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Netguru or UX studio?
Netguru is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Netguru and UX studio?
Netguru's primary differentiator is: combines product design with full software delivery at a scale (600–900+ people, 1,000+ projects) most boutiques on this list can't match. UX studio's primary differentiator is: a research-first methodology comparable in rigor to Phenomenon Studio's own discovery-first approach, applied specifically to complex B2B SaaS products. They also differ in team size (600–900+ vs 60–71), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.