Best Product Design Agencies

Netguru vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

UXDA (4.3/5) edges ahead of Netguru (4.0/5) overall. UXDA is the better choice for banks and fintech, exclusively financial-services UX. Netguru is the stronger option for companies wanting design plus full development, one team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Netguru vs UXDA: head-to-head summary

Criterion Netguru UXDA
Founded 2008 2015
HQ Poznań, Poland Riga, Latvia
Team size 600–900+ 25+
Rating 4.0 / 5 4.3 / 5
Primary differentiator Combines product design with full software delivery at a scale (600–900+ people, 1,000+ projects) most boutiques on this list can't match The only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team, T&M Fixed project, retainer
Min. engagement Not published $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Figma, React, Node.js Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook
Industries served SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, E-commerce / retail Financial services / fintech

Netguru vs UXDA: overview

Netguru

Wiktor Schmidt and Jakub Filipowski started Netguru in Poznań, Poland, in May 2008. Nearly two decades later it runs six Polish offices — Poznań, Warsaw, Kraków, Wrocław, Gdańsk, Białystok — and a team reported between 600 and 900+ people, delivering more than 1,000 projects. Netguru pairs product design with full software development for brands like IKEA, Volkswagen, OLX, Delivery Hero, Wolt, and Vinted, plus fintech client Solarisbank, and has picked up a Clutch Leader Award and a spot on the FT 1000 Europe's Fastest Growing Companies list.

UXDA

Alex Kreger co-founded UXDA (Financial UX Design) in 2015, building a deliberately narrow practice from Riga, Latvia, with a 25-person multidisciplinary team. A decade in, UXDA has shaped or governed 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms across 39 countries — a level of single-vertical repetition none of the generalist studios on this list can claim. There's no branding or consumer-product work here; every engagement is financial-services UX.

Services and capabilities: Netguru vs UXDA

Capability Netguru UXDA
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: Netguru vs UXDA

Framework / platform Netguru UXDA
Figma
Webflow N/A N/A
React N/A
Framer N/A N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A
After Effects N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Netguru vs UXDA

Criterion Netguru UXDA
Minimum engagement Not published $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time & materials Fixed project, Retainer
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Accessible

Target audience comparison: Netguru vs UXDA

Dimension Netguru UXDA
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, E-commerce / retail Financial services / fintech
Best use cases Large-scale SaaS or e-commerce product design and development, Fintech product build requiring both design and engineering at scale Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Netguru vs UXDA: pros and cons

Netguru
+ 600–900+ person team across six Polish offices supports large, multi-workstream programs
+ 1,000+ delivered projects and a Clutch Leader Award back up the scale claim with independent recognition
+ Client list spans IKEA, Volkswagen, OLX, Delivery Hero, and fintech client Solarisbank
+ Pairs design with full development, reducing hand-off risk between design and engineering vendors
- Reported team size varies by source (600 to 900+), making exact capacity harder to pin down
- Scale suited to larger programs may mean less individualized attention than a boutique studio offers
- Broad software-development focus means somewhat less concentrated design-only specialization than research-led boutiques
UXDA
+ Exclusive financial-services focus builds deep domain expertise generalist studios can't match
+ 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade
+ A small, senior 25-person team keeps relationships direct rather than layered through account management
+ A decade of single-vertical operation compounds domain knowledge project over project
- Exclusive fintech focus is a liability for any client outside financial services
- $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) runs high for a 25-person boutique
- Small team size caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs

Who should choose Netguru?

A typical fit: large-scale SaaS or e-commerce product design and development.

Combines product design with full software delivery at a scale (600–900+ people, 1,000+ projects) most boutiques on this list can't match. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, E-commerce / retail.

Who should choose UXDA?

A typical fit: bank digital platform redesign.

The only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.

Decision matrix: Netguru vs UXDA

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Netguru
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Netguru
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Netguru (Not published) vs UXDA ($30K (per company website; independently unverifiable))
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Netguru
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Netguru vs UXDA

Use case Netguru fit UXDA fit Winner
Large-scale SaaS or e-commerce product design and development Strong Limited Netguru
Fintech product build requiring both design and engineering at scale Strong Strong Both equally
Bank digital platform redesign Limited Strong UXDA
Fintech app UX for a regulated market Strong Strong Both equally
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Netguru vs UXDA

UXDA (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. The only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries.

Netguru (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need fintech product build requiring both design and engineering at scale. If your situation matches that, Netguru is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Netguru vs UXDA FAQ

Is Netguru better than UXDA?

UXDA (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Netguru's strongest advantage: 600–900+ person team across six Polish offices supports large, multi-workstream programs. UXDA's strongest advantage: exclusive financial-services focus builds deep domain expertise generalist studios can't match.

How do Netguru and UXDA differ in pricing?

Netguru uses fixed project, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Netguru or UXDA?

Netguru is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Netguru and UXDA?

Netguru's primary differentiator is: combines product design with full software delivery at a scale (600–900+ people, 1,000+ projects) most boutiques on this list can't match. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only studio on this list built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (600–900+ vs 25+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech).

Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.