R/GA vs Fireart Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Fireart Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of R/GA (3.8/5) overall. Fireart Studio is the better choice for startups and mid-market companies that want a single studio to handle both product design and full software development.. R/GA is the stronger option for large consumer and enterprise brands that need product design fused with marketing-led brand strategy across multiple regions.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
R/GA vs Fireart Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | R/GA | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1977 | 2013 |
| HQ | New York City, NY, USA | Warsaw, Poland (Ukraine-founded roots) |
| Team size | ~2,000 | 100–150+ |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best for | Large consumer and enterprise brands that need product design fused with marketing-led brand strategy across multiple regions. | Startups and mid-market companies that want a single studio to handle both product design and full software development. |
| Pricing model | Project-based, retainer for ongoing programs | Fixed project, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, After Effects | Figma, React, Next.js |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
R/GA vs Fireart Studio: overview
R/GA
Founded in 1977 and headquartered in New York City, R/GA operates from ten countries including Austin, London, São Paulo, Singapore, and Stockholm. R/GA spent 23 years inside Interpublic Group before completing an independent buyout in March 2025 with private equity partner Truelink Capital — a recent ownership change worth disclosing. The firm's positioning fuses digital product and service design with marketing and technology, producing strong enterprise and consumer platform work for large brands.
Fireart Studio
Founded in 2013 with roots in Ukraine, Fireart Studio is now headquartered in Warsaw, Poland, having grown from 1 to 150+ people over ten years. The studio has delivered 700+ projects for 200+ clients and holds Clutch recognition as a 'Leading UX Design Team' along with Top Graphic Design Company recognitions from Clutch, DesignRush, and The Manifest. Fireart positions itself as a boutique digital product design and software development studio.
Services and capabilities: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
| Capability | R/GA | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
| Framework / platform | R/GA | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
| Criterion | R/GA | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
| Dimension | R/GA | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch, Enterprise digital product with a marketing/campaign component | End-to-end SaaS product design and development, Startup MVP design and build |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
R/GA vs Fireart Studio: pros and cons
| R/GA | |
|---|---|
| + | Fuses product design with marketing and brand strategy, useful for clients who need both under one vendor |
| + | Global presence across ten countries covering North America, Europe, Latin America, and APAC |
| + | Nearly five decades of brand and case-study history |
| + | Now operating independently after a 2025 buyout, following 23 years inside Interpublic Group |
| - | Recent (March 2025) ownership change from Interpublic Group to a private-equity-backed independent structure — still stabilizing post-buyout |
| - | Marketing-led positioning means less pure product-design specialist depth than boutique studios |
| - | Scale suits large brand budgets more than startup-stage product teams |
| Fireart Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years is one of the deepest track records among boutique studios in this list |
| + | Clutch-recognized 'Leading UX Design Team,' with additional Top Graphic Design Company recognitions from DesignRush and The Manifest |
| + | Grew from 1 to 150+ people while retaining a boutique, single-studio culture |
| + | Combines product design with full software development, reducing hand-off risk |
| - | Relocated its HQ from Ukraine to Warsaw amid regional instability — worth noting for clients evaluating delivery continuity |
| - | $20K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier relative to the most accessible boutiques in this list |
| - | Broad software-development focus means slightly less pure design specialization than research-only studios |
Who should choose R/GA?
R/GA is the right choice for large consumer and enterprise brands that need product design fused with marketing-led brand strategy across multiple regions..
Combines digital product design with marketing/brand strategy under one roof, now operating independently after its 2025 buyout from IPG. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment.
Who should choose Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio is the right choice for startups and mid-market companies that want a single studio to handle both product design and full software development..
700+ delivered projects across 200+ clients with independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition on Clutch. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | R/GA |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Fireart Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: R/GA (Not published) vs Fireart Studio ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | R/GA |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
| Use case | R/GA fit | Fireart Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch | Strong | Limited | R/GA |
| Enterprise digital product with a marketing/campaign component | Strong | Limited | R/GA |
| End-to-end SaaS product design and development | Limited | Strong | Fireart Studio |
| Startup MVP design and build | Limited | Strong | Fireart Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: R/GA vs Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. 700+ delivered projects across 200+ clients with independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition on Clutch. It is best for startups and mid-market companies that want a single studio to handle both product design and full software development..
R/GA (3.8/5) is the better choice when large consumer and enterprise brands that need product design fused with marketing-led brand strategy across multiple regions.. If your situation matches those criteria, R/GA is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
R/GA vs Fireart Studio FAQ
Is R/GA better than Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. R/GA is better for large consumer and enterprise brands that need product design fused with marketing-led brand strategy across multiple regions.. Fireart Studio is better for startups and mid-market companies that want a single studio to handle both product design and full software development..
How do R/GA and Fireart Studio differ in pricing?
R/GA uses project-based, retainer for ongoing programs pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Fireart Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: R/GA or Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between R/GA and Fireart Studio?
R/GA's primary differentiator is: combines digital product design with marketing/brand strategy under one roof, now operating independently after its 2025 buyout from ipg. Fireart Studio's primary differentiator is: 700+ delivered projects across 200+ clients with independently-verified 'leading ux design team' recognition on clutch. They also differ in team size (~2,000 vs 100–150+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.