R/GA vs Ramotion: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Ramotion (3.9/5) edges ahead of R/GA (3.7/5) overall. Ramotion is the better choice for Startups/mid-market, brand identity plus product design. R/GA is the stronger option for large brands, product design bundled with marketing. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
R/GA vs Ramotion: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | R/GA | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1977 | 2009 |
| HQ | New York City, NY, USA | San Francisco, CA, USA |
| Team size | ~2,000 | 29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount) |
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Pairs product design with marketing and brand strategy under one roof, now operating independently of a holding company for the first time in over two decades | Bundles brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for a client range spanning early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies |
| Pricing model | Project-based, retainer for ongoing programs | Fixed project, T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, After Effects | Figma, Webflow, React |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
R/GA vs Ramotion: overview
R/GA
R/GA has operated out of New York since 1977 and today works from ten countries, including offices in Austin, London, São Paulo, Singapore, and Stockholm. For 23 years it sat inside Interpublic Group before completing an independent buyout with private equity partner Truelink Capital in March 2025 — recent enough that prospective clients should ask how the transition has settled. The firm's pitch has always leaned toward pairing digital product design with marketing and brand strategy, which shows up in its enterprise and consumer platform work for large brands.
Ramotion
Ramotion has run out of San Francisco since 2009, with additional offices in Los Angeles and New York. Its own site claims "70+ team experts," while third-party employee trackers put the core headcount closer to 29 — a gap worth asking about directly before committing to a project. What isn't in dispute is the work: brand identity, UX/UI, and web/mobile development for a client range stretching from early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies.
Services and capabilities: R/GA vs Ramotion
| Capability | R/GA | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: R/GA vs Ramotion
| Framework / platform | R/GA | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: R/GA vs Ramotion
| Criterion | R/GA | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: R/GA vs Ramotion
| Dimension | R/GA | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch, Enterprise digital product with a marketing or campaign component | Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup, Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
R/GA vs Ramotion: pros and cons
| R/GA | |
|---|---|
| + | Combines product design with marketing and brand strategy, useful for clients who'd otherwise need two vendors |
| + | Ten-country footprint covers North America, Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific |
| + | Nearly five decades of brand history and case studies |
| + | Now independently owned following its March 2025 buyout, after 23 years inside Interpublic Group |
| - | The 2025 ownership change from Interpublic Group to a private-equity-backed independent structure is still recent and worth asking about directly |
| - | Marketing-led positioning means less pure product-design specialization than boutique studios built around design alone |
| - | Scale and pricing tend to suit large brand budgets more than startup-stage product teams |
| Ramotion | |
|---|---|
| + | 16 years in continuous operation since 2009 |
| + | Combines brand identity with product design and app development in one team |
| + | Serves both early-stage startups and Fortune 500 clients, giving flexible scale |
| + | Three US office locations — San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York |
| - | Team size claims diverge sharply: the company states 70+ experts while third-party trackers report as few as ~29 core employees |
| - | $25K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier, not the most accessible option here |
| - | Broad brand-plus-product positioning trades off some depth against studios focused purely on product design |
Who should choose R/GA?
A typical fit: consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch.
Pairs product design with marketing and brand strategy under one roof, now operating independently of a holding company for the first time in over two decades. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment.
Who should choose Ramotion?
A typical fit: brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup.
Bundles brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for a client range spanning early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: R/GA vs Ramotion
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | R/GA |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: R/GA (Not published) vs Ramotion ($25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | R/GA |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: R/GA vs Ramotion
| Use case | R/GA fit | Ramotion fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch | Strong | Limited | R/GA |
| Enterprise digital product with a marketing or campaign component | Strong | Limited | R/GA |
| Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company | Limited | Strong | Ramotion |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: R/GA vs Ramotion
Ramotion (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Bundles brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for a client range spanning early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies.
R/GA (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need enterprise digital product with a marketing or campaign component. If your situation matches that, R/GA is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
R/GA vs Ramotion FAQ
Is R/GA better than Ramotion?
Ramotion (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. R/GA's strongest advantage: combines product design with marketing and brand strategy, useful for clients who'd otherwise need two vendors. Ramotion's strongest advantage: 16 years in continuous operation since 2009.
How do R/GA and Ramotion differ in pricing?
R/GA uses project-based, retainer for ongoing programs pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Ramotion uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: R/GA or Ramotion?
Ramotion is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between R/GA and Ramotion?
R/GA's primary differentiator is: pairs product design with marketing and brand strategy under one roof, now operating independently of a holding company for the first time in over two decades. Ramotion's primary differentiator is: bundles brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for a client range spanning early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies. They also differ in team size (~2,000 vs 29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.