Work & Co vs Fireart Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Fireart Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Work & Co (3.8/5) overall. Fireart Studio is the better choice for Startups/mid-market, design plus full development, one studio. Work & Co is the stronger option for premium brands, design paired with strong engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs Fireart Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | Warsaw, Poland (Ukraine-founded roots) |
| Team size | 425+ | 100–150+ |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | An engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song | 700+ delivered projects across 200+ clients, with independently verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition on Clutch |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, React, Next.js |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Work & Co vs Fireart Studio: overview
Work & Co
Five co-founders — Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo — started Work & Co in May 2013 out of Dumbo, Brooklyn, and the studio has since opened offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe. What's unusual is the client list relative to headcount: Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney have all hired a studio of roughly 425 people. Work & Co is now part of Accenture Song, a detail worth surfacing alongside the design credentials.
Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio started in 2013 with roots in Ukraine and has since relocated its headquarters to Warsaw, Poland, growing from a single founder to 150+ people along the way. Clutch recognizes Fireart as a "Leading UX Design Team," and DesignRush and The Manifest have separately named it a Top Graphic Design Company. Across a decade, the studio has delivered 700+ projects for 200+ clients, combining product design with full software development under one roof.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Fireart Studio
| Capability | Work & Co | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Fireart Studio
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Fireart Studio
| Criterion | Work & Co | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Fireart Studio
| Dimension | Work & Co | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | End-to-end SaaS product design and development, Startup MVP design and build |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs Fireart Studio: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster — Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney — is exceptional relative to a roughly 425-person studio |
| + | Engineering-heavy delivery model keeps design and build under one roof, cutting hand-off risk |
| + | 425+ people across the US, Europe, and Latin America give genuine multi-region coverage |
| + | Strong track record on premium consumer digital product launches |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song, the same parent as Accenture Song's own listing here — worth noting for buyers comparing the two |
| - | Premium client roster implies premium pricing, though no minimum engagement figure is published |
| - | Less vertical specialization in fintech or healthcare than boutiques built specifically around those industries |
| Fireart Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years — one of the deepest track records among boutique studios here |
| + | Clutch-recognized 'Leading UX Design Team,' plus Top Graphic Design Company recognitions from DesignRush and The Manifest |
| + | Grew from a single founder to 150+ people while keeping a boutique, single-studio culture |
| + | Combines product design with full software development, reducing hand-off risk |
| - | Relocated its HQ from Ukraine to Warsaw amid regional instability — worth asking about for delivery continuity |
| - | $20K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier relative to the most accessible boutiques here |
| - | Broad software-development focus trades off some pure design specialization against research-only studios |
Who should choose Work & Co?
A typical fit: flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand.
An engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose Fireart Studio?
A typical fit: end-to-end SaaS product design and development.
700+ delivered projects across 200+ clients, with independently verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition on Clutch. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Fireart Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Fireart Studio ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs Fireart Studio
| Use case | Work & Co fit | Fireart Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| End-to-end SaaS product design and development | Limited | Strong | Fireart Studio |
| Startup MVP design and build | Limited | Strong | Fireart Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. 700+ delivered projects across 200+ clients, with independently verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition on Clutch.
Work & Co (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need e-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering. If your situation matches that, Work & Co is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs Fireart Studio FAQ
Is Work & Co better than Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co's strongest advantage: client roster — Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney — is exceptional relative to a roughly 425-person studio. Fireart Studio's strongest advantage: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years — one of the deepest track records among boutique studios here.
How do Work & Co and Fireart Studio differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Fireart Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and Fireart Studio?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song. Fireart Studio's primary differentiator is: 700+ delivered projects across 200+ clients, with independently verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition on Clutch. They also differ in team size (425+ vs 100–150+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.