Work & Co vs Huge Inc: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Work & Co (3.8/5) edges ahead of Huge Inc (3.7/5) overall. Work & Co is the better choice for premium brands, design paired with strong engineering. Huge Inc is the stronger option for large enterprise brands, big recently-restructured agency. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs Huge Inc: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | Huge Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 1999 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | Manhattan, NYC, USA (relocated from Brooklyn Oct 2025) |
| Team size | 425+ | ~1,240 |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | An engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song | One of the longest-running agency names on this list, now reset under new private-equity ownership and merged with Hero Digital |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Project-based, retainer |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, React |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products |
Work & Co vs Huge Inc: overview
Work & Co
Five co-founders — Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo — started Work & Co in May 2013 out of Dumbo, Brooklyn, and the studio has since opened offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe. What's unusual is the client list relative to headcount: Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney have all hired a studio of roughly 425 people. Work & Co is now part of Accenture Song, a detail worth surfacing alongside the design credentials.
Huge Inc
David Skokna, Sasha Kirovski, Gene Liebel, and Aaron Shapiro started Huge in Brooklyn in 1999; the agency moved to Manhattan in October 2025. Most of Huge's history was spent inside Interpublic Group, until private equity firm AEA Investors bought it in December 2024 and merged it with Hero Digital — recent enough that clients should ask how integration is going. Post-merger, the combined agency runs around 1,240 people, with engagement sizes typical of a large agency rather than published per project.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Huge Inc
| Capability | Work & Co | Huge Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Huge Inc
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | Huge Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Huge Inc
| Criterion | Work & Co | Huge Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Huge Inc
| Dimension | Work & Co | Huge Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Enterprise brand and digital product redesign, Large-scale web platform modernization |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs Huge Inc: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster — Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney — is exceptional relative to a roughly 425-person studio |
| + | Engineering-heavy delivery model keeps design and build under one roof, cutting hand-off risk |
| + | 425+ people across the US, Europe, and Latin America give genuine multi-region coverage |
| + | Strong track record on premium consumer digital product launches |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song, the same parent as Accenture Song's own listing here — worth noting for buyers comparing the two |
| - | Premium client roster implies premium pricing, though no minimum engagement figure is published |
| - | Less vertical specialization in fintech or healthcare than boutiques built specifically around those industries |
| Huge Inc | |
|---|---|
| + | 26 years of enterprise digital design case studies and brand history |
| + | Post-merger headcount of roughly 1,240 gives significant delivery capacity |
| + | Service range spans brand, product, and web design and development |
| + | The Hero Digital merger brings additional capabilities into the combined agency |
| - | Sold to private equity firm AEA Investors in December 2024 and merged with Hero Digital — a structural change that's still settling |
| - | Long tenure inside Interpublic Group followed by a 2024 sale means less continuity than an independently owned studio offers |
| - | Large-agency engagement sizes aren't published, making budget planning harder for smaller teams |
Who should choose Work & Co?
A typical fit: flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand.
An engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose Huge Inc?
A typical fit: enterprise brand and digital product redesign.
One of the longest-running agency names on this list, now reset under new private-equity ownership and merged with Hero Digital. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Huge Inc
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Huge Inc (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs Huge Inc
| Use case | Work & Co fit | Huge Inc fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| Enterprise brand and digital product redesign | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Large-scale web platform modernization | Limited | Strong | Huge Inc |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs Huge Inc
Work & Co (3.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. An engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song.
Huge Inc (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need large-scale web platform modernization. If your situation matches that, Huge Inc is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs Huge Inc FAQ
Is Work & Co better than Huge Inc?
Work & Co (3.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co's strongest advantage: client roster — Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney — is exceptional relative to a roughly 425-person studio. Huge Inc's strongest advantage: 26 years of enterprise digital design case studies and brand history.
How do Work & Co and Huge Inc differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Huge Inc uses project-based, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Huge Inc?
Huge Inc is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and Huge Inc?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song. Huge Inc's primary differentiator is: one of the longest-running agency names on this list, now reset under new private-equity ownership and merged with Hero Digital. They also differ in team size (425+ vs ~1,240), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs Enterprise transformation, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.