Work & Co vs Netguru: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Netguru (4.0/5) edges ahead of Work & Co (3.8/5) overall. Netguru is the better choice for companies wanting design plus full development, one team. Work & Co is the stronger option for premium brands, design paired with strong engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs Netguru: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2008 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | Poznań, Poland |
| Team size | 425+ | 600–900+ |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | An engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song | Combines product design with full software delivery at a scale (600–900+ people, 1,000+ projects) most boutiques on this list can't match |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, React, Node.js |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, E-commerce / retail |
Work & Co vs Netguru: overview
Work & Co
Five co-founders — Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo — started Work & Co in May 2013 out of Dumbo, Brooklyn, and the studio has since opened offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe. What's unusual is the client list relative to headcount: Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney have all hired a studio of roughly 425 people. Work & Co is now part of Accenture Song, a detail worth surfacing alongside the design credentials.
Netguru
Wiktor Schmidt and Jakub Filipowski started Netguru in Poznań, Poland, in May 2008. Nearly two decades later it runs six Polish offices — Poznań, Warsaw, Kraków, Wrocław, Gdańsk, Białystok — and a team reported between 600 and 900+ people, delivering more than 1,000 projects. Netguru pairs product design with full software development for brands like IKEA, Volkswagen, OLX, Delivery Hero, Wolt, and Vinted, plus fintech client Solarisbank, and has picked up a Clutch Leader Award and a spot on the FT 1000 Europe's Fastest Growing Companies list.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Netguru
| Capability | Work & Co | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Netguru
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Netguru
| Criterion | Work & Co | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Netguru
| Dimension | Work & Co | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, E-commerce / retail |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Large-scale SaaS or e-commerce product design and development, Fintech product build requiring both design and engineering at scale |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs Netguru: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster — Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney — is exceptional relative to a roughly 425-person studio |
| + | Engineering-heavy delivery model keeps design and build under one roof, cutting hand-off risk |
| + | 425+ people across the US, Europe, and Latin America give genuine multi-region coverage |
| + | Strong track record on premium consumer digital product launches |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song, the same parent as Accenture Song's own listing here — worth noting for buyers comparing the two |
| - | Premium client roster implies premium pricing, though no minimum engagement figure is published |
| - | Less vertical specialization in fintech or healthcare than boutiques built specifically around those industries |
| Netguru | |
|---|---|
| + | 600–900+ person team across six Polish offices supports large, multi-workstream programs |
| + | 1,000+ delivered projects and a Clutch Leader Award back up the scale claim with independent recognition |
| + | Client list spans IKEA, Volkswagen, OLX, Delivery Hero, and fintech client Solarisbank |
| + | Pairs design with full development, reducing hand-off risk between design and engineering vendors |
| - | Reported team size varies by source (600 to 900+), making exact capacity harder to pin down |
| - | Scale suited to larger programs may mean less individualized attention than a boutique studio offers |
| - | Broad software-development focus means somewhat less concentrated design-only specialization than research-led boutiques |
Who should choose Work & Co?
A typical fit: flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand.
An engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose Netguru?
A typical fit: large-scale SaaS or e-commerce product design and development.
Combines product design with full software delivery at a scale (600–900+ people, 1,000+ projects) most boutiques on this list can't match. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, E-commerce / retail.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Netguru
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Netguru (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs Netguru
| Use case | Work & Co fit | Netguru fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Large-scale SaaS or e-commerce product design and development | Limited | Strong | Netguru |
| Fintech product build requiring both design and engineering at scale | Limited | Strong | Netguru |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs Netguru
Netguru (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Combines product design with full software delivery at a scale (600–900+ people, 1,000+ projects) most boutiques on this list can't match.
Work & Co (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need e-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering. If your situation matches that, Work & Co is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs Netguru FAQ
Is Work & Co better than Netguru?
Netguru (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co's strongest advantage: client roster — Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney — is exceptional relative to a roughly 425-person studio. Netguru's strongest advantage: 600–900+ person team across six Polish offices supports large, multi-workstream programs.
How do Work & Co and Netguru differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Netguru uses fixed project, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Netguru?
Netguru is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and Netguru?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song. Netguru's primary differentiator is: combines product design with full software delivery at a scale (600–900+ people, 1,000+ projects) most boutiques on this list can't match. They also differ in team size (425+ vs 600–900+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.