Work & Co vs Qubstudio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Qubstudio (4.6/5) edges ahead of Work & Co (3.8/5) overall. Qubstudio is the better choice for Fintech, logistics, healthcare — MVP through enterprise redesign. Work & Co is the stronger option for premium brands, design paired with strong engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs Qubstudio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2006 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | London, UK (Canary Wharf), Ukraine-based delivery team |
| Team size | 425+ | 51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals) |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | An engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song | Ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with Red Dot Design Award recognition on top |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Sketch, Webflow |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
Work & Co vs Qubstudio: overview
Work & Co
Five co-founders — Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo — started Work & Co in May 2013 out of Dumbo, Brooklyn, and the studio has since opened offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe. What's unusual is the client list relative to headcount: Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney have all hired a studio of roughly 425 people. Work & Co is now part of Accenture Song, a detail worth surfacing alongside the design credentials.
Qubstudio
Qubstudio was founded around 2006 or 2007 (sources disagree on the exact year) and is headquartered in London's Canary Wharf, with delivery handled by a Ukraine-based team. The company states roughly 70 creative professionals, sitting inside a broader 51–200 employee band reported by directories. In Clutch's 2026 rankings, Qubstudio came out #1 among UX/UI agencies across 90+ reviews, and has separately picked up Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition, working across fintech, logistics, healthcare, and EdTech from MVP launches through enterprise redesigns.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Capability | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Criterion | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Dimension | Work & Co | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Fintech MVP launch design, Logistics platform UX overhaul |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs Qubstudio: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster — Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney — is exceptional relative to a roughly 425-person studio |
| + | Engineering-heavy delivery model keeps design and build under one roof, cutting hand-off risk |
| + | 425+ people across the US, Europe, and Latin America give genuine multi-region coverage |
| + | Strong track record on premium consumer digital product launches |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song, the same parent as Accenture Song's own listing here — worth noting for buyers comparing the two |
| - | Premium client roster implies premium pricing, though no minimum engagement figure is published |
| - | Less vertical specialization in fintech or healthcare than boutiques built specifically around those industries |
| Qubstudio | |
|---|---|
| + | Ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ public reviews |
| + | Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition independently verify design quality |
| + | Nearly two decades of operation with a London HQ and a Ukraine-based delivery team |
| + | Covers everything from MVP launches to enterprise digital transformation |
| - | Founding year is disputed between sources (2006 vs. 2007) — treated here as approximate |
| - | Ukraine-based delivery introduces the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted studios on this list |
| - | The 51–200 employee band from directories is wide; the company's own ~70 creative professionals figure is more precise but self-reported |
Who should choose Work & Co?
A typical fit: flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand.
An engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose Qubstudio?
A typical fit: fintech MVP launch design.
Ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with Red Dot Design Award recognition on top. Minimum engagement starts at $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Qubstudio ($15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
| Use case | Work & Co fit | Qubstudio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| Fintech MVP launch design | Limited | Strong | Qubstudio |
| Logistics platform UX overhaul | Limited | Strong | Qubstudio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs Qubstudio
Qubstudio (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with Red Dot Design Award recognition on top.
Work & Co (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need e-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering. If your situation matches that, Work & Co is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs Qubstudio FAQ
Is Work & Co better than Qubstudio?
Qubstudio (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co's strongest advantage: client roster — Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney — is exceptional relative to a roughly 425-person studio. Qubstudio's strongest advantage: ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ public reviews.
How do Work & Co and Qubstudio differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Qubstudio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Qubstudio?
Qubstudio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and Qubstudio?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song. Qubstudio's primary differentiator is: ranked #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with Red Dot Design Award recognition on top. They also differ in team size (425+ vs 51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs Financial services / fintech, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.