Work & Co vs Ramotion: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Ramotion (3.9/5) edges ahead of Work & Co (3.8/5) overall. Ramotion is the better choice for Startups/mid-market, brand identity plus product design. Work & Co is the stronger option for premium brands, design paired with strong engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs Ramotion: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2009 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | San Francisco, CA, USA |
| Team size | 425+ | 29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount) |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | An engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song | Bundles brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for a client range spanning early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Webflow, React |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Work & Co vs Ramotion: overview
Work & Co
Five co-founders — Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo — started Work & Co in May 2013 out of Dumbo, Brooklyn, and the studio has since opened offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe. What's unusual is the client list relative to headcount: Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney have all hired a studio of roughly 425 people. Work & Co is now part of Accenture Song, a detail worth surfacing alongside the design credentials.
Ramotion
Ramotion has run out of San Francisco since 2009, with additional offices in Los Angeles and New York. Its own site claims "70+ team experts," while third-party employee trackers put the core headcount closer to 29 — a gap worth asking about directly before committing to a project. What isn't in dispute is the work: brand identity, UX/UI, and web/mobile development for a client range stretching from early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Ramotion
| Capability | Work & Co | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Ramotion
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Ramotion
| Criterion | Work & Co | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Ramotion
| Dimension | Work & Co | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup, Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs Ramotion: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster — Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney — is exceptional relative to a roughly 425-person studio |
| + | Engineering-heavy delivery model keeps design and build under one roof, cutting hand-off risk |
| + | 425+ people across the US, Europe, and Latin America give genuine multi-region coverage |
| + | Strong track record on premium consumer digital product launches |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song, the same parent as Accenture Song's own listing here — worth noting for buyers comparing the two |
| - | Premium client roster implies premium pricing, though no minimum engagement figure is published |
| - | Less vertical specialization in fintech or healthcare than boutiques built specifically around those industries |
| Ramotion | |
|---|---|
| + | 16 years in continuous operation since 2009 |
| + | Combines brand identity with product design and app development in one team |
| + | Serves both early-stage startups and Fortune 500 clients, giving flexible scale |
| + | Three US office locations — San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York |
| - | Team size claims diverge sharply: the company states 70+ experts while third-party trackers report as few as ~29 core employees |
| - | $25K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier, not the most accessible option here |
| - | Broad brand-plus-product positioning trades off some depth against studios focused purely on product design |
Who should choose Work & Co?
A typical fit: flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand.
An engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose Ramotion?
A typical fit: brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup.
Bundles brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for a client range spanning early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Ramotion
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Ramotion ($25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs Ramotion
| Use case | Work & Co fit | Ramotion fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company | Limited | Strong | Ramotion |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs Ramotion
Ramotion (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Bundles brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for a client range spanning early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies.
Work & Co (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need e-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering. If your situation matches that, Work & Co is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs Ramotion FAQ
Is Work & Co better than Ramotion?
Ramotion (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co's strongest advantage: client roster — Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney — is exceptional relative to a roughly 425-person studio. Ramotion's strongest advantage: 16 years in continuous operation since 2009.
How do Work & Co and Ramotion differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Ramotion uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Ramotion?
Ramotion is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and Ramotion?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-heavy studio with a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its size, now operating inside Accenture Song. Ramotion's primary differentiator is: bundles brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for a client range spanning early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies. They also differ in team size (425+ vs 29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.