Best Product Design Agencies

Work & Co vs Excited: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Excited (4.6/5) edges ahead of Work & Co (3.9/5) overall. Excited is the better choice for saaS and fintech product teams that want a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency pricing.. Work & Co is the stronger option for premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Work & Co vs Excited: head-to-head summary

Criterion Work & Co Excited
Founded 2013 2018
HQ Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA Lviv, Ukraine
Team size 425+ 100+
Rating 3.9 / 5 4.6 / 5
Best for Premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution. SaaS and fintech product teams that want a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency pricing.
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Fixed project, dedicated team
Min. engagement Not published $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Figma, React, Next.js Figma, Framer, After Effects
Industries served Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech

Work & Co vs Excited: overview

Work & Co

Founded in May 2013 by Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo, Work & Co is headquartered in Dumbo, Brooklyn with additional offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe. The studio's client roster includes Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney — a notably premium list for a firm of its size (425+ people). Work & Co is now part of Accenture Song, an ownership detail worth disclosing alongside its design credentials.

Excited

Founded in 2018 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, Excited has grown to a team of 100+ designers and is consistently ranked among the Top 5 UX agencies worldwide by Clutch, with roughly 70% of reviewers citing quality and creativity specifically. The agency covers UX/UI, product design, branding, and motion design, built specifically for SaaS and fintech clients, with work shipped to 20+ countries and products reportedly used by 15M+ people (per company; independently unverifiable exact reach figure).

Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs Excited

Capability Work & Co Excited
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs Excited

Framework / platform Work & Co Excited
Figma
Webflow N/A N/A
React N/A
Framer N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A N/A
After Effects N/A

Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs Excited

Criterion Work & Co Excited
Minimum engagement Not published $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Fixed project, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Accessible

Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs Excited

Dimension Work & Co Excited
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech
Best use cases Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company, Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Work & Co vs Excited: pros and cons

Work & Co
+ Client roster (Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney) is unusually strong relative to the firm's headcount
+ Engineering-heavy delivery model means design and build happen under one roof, reducing hand-off risk
+ 425+ people across US, Europe, and Latin America gives real multi-region coverage
+ Strong track record on premium consumer digital product launches
- Now part of Accenture Song — the same parent company as Accenture Song itself in this roster, an ownership overlap worth noting
- Premium client roster suggests premium pricing, though no minimum engagement is published
- Less specialized in any single vertical (fintech, healthcare) than boutique competitors
Excited
+ Consistently ranked Top 5 UX agency worldwide by Clutch — an independently verified, repeated ranking rather than a one-off
+ Roughly 70% of Clutch reviewers cite quality/creativity specifically, a strong qualitative signal
+ Built specifically around SaaS and fintech, giving genuine vertical depth
+ Work shipped to 20+ countries demonstrates broad delivery experience
- The 15M+ user reach figure is self-reported by the company and independently unverifiable
- Ukraine-based team introduces the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted studios
- SaaS/fintech focus means less fit for buyers in healthcare, consumer, or other verticals

Who should choose Work & Co?

Work & Co is the right choice for premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution..

Engineering-led product design studio with an unusually premium client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) for its size. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.

Who should choose Excited?

Excited is the right choice for saaS and fintech product teams that want a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency pricing..

Consistently ranked Top 5 UX agency worldwide by Clutch, with roughly 70% of reviews citing quality and creativity by name. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech.

Decision matrix: Work & Co vs Excited

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Work & Co
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Work & Co
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs Excited ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable))
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Work & Co
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Work & Co vs Excited

Use case Work & Co fit Excited fit Winner
Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand Strong Limited Work & Co
E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering Strong Limited Work & Co
SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company Limited Strong Excited
Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish Limited Strong Excited
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Work & Co vs Excited

Excited (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Consistently ranked Top 5 UX agency worldwide by Clutch, with roughly 70% of reviews citing quality and creativity by name. It is best for saaS and fintech product teams that want a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency pricing..

Work & Co (3.9/5) is the better choice when premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution.. If your situation matches those criteria, Work & Co is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Work & Co vs Excited FAQ

Is Work & Co better than Excited?

Excited (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co is better for premium consumer and enterprise brands that need design paired with strong front-end engineering execution.. Excited is better for saaS and fintech product teams that want a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency pricing..

How do Work & Co and Excited differ in pricing?

Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Excited uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or Excited?

Work & Co is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Work & Co and Excited?

Work & Co's primary differentiator is: engineering-led product design studio with an unusually premium client roster (apple, ikea, nike, disney) for its size. Excited's primary differentiator is: consistently ranked top 5 ux agency worldwide by clutch, with roughly 70% of reviews citing quality and creativity by name. They also differ in team size (425+ vs 100+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).

Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.